Django has great API documentation - as do most of the libraries and
apps in the ecosystem. But I have been having a hard time finding
examples that put all the pieces together. So as an aid to myself -
and anyone else who is having trouble stringing image upload,
thumbnail creation and S3 storage together, I put together a minimal
project that supports uploading a user avatar in a Django 1.8 project.
(Sorry, there are no unit tests, but the tests in the django-cleanup
repository might be useful examples.)
Someday I may expand this to a longer post on Ruby debugging, but
until then I am writing it down so I don’t have to search for it on
Stack Overflow again.
If you need to debug an erb snippet in irb, this function gives you
a handy shortcut for combining the template and arbitrary instance
variables. Copy it into your irb session:
And then you can use it as follows:
Kind of handy especially if you need to test out some ruby inside the <%= %> tag.
There are a couple of wrinkles about mixing ruby modules into your
chef code. The first appears to be that the chef DSL takes over
everything (or nearly everything) - including the include
command. So using normal ruby like include MyModule inside a recipe
file causes a compile time error:
That seems odd - but it is probaby a good thing since if it worked, it
might end up including your library code into the wrong place. With
nearly all libraries, you want your module code available in some
specific execution scope - which is probably not the compile time
scope. To use our UsefulMethods module in our recipe context, we
need the following in our recipe file:
This blog post on the Chef.io site
does a really nice job of explaining how (and why) to write libraries
and then use them in your recipes. In their example code, the library
code needs to be used inside the user resource: Chef::Resource::User.
Creating Modules Inside a Namespace
The second example in the custom libraries section of
Customizing Ruby
shows another option for how to get your library code exactly where
you want it. Instead of defining a generic module and then including
it in your recipe, as above, you can set up your library within the
namespace in which you want to use it. In the case of our
UsefulModules code, we rewrite the library as a class inside the
Chef::Recipe namespace:
And then in our recipe file we don’t have to send any message to
include the new class. Because it was created inside the Chef::Recipe
namespace, it gets loaded into our recipe context when the library
file is loaded at the beginning of the chef run. We can just call the
class method like so:
There are a couple of different techniques for logging during a chef
client run. The simplest option for debugging things in any
programming language is by adding print statements - or in the case of
Ruby, puts statements (print with a newline added). However, in
order for print statements to work, they need to be executed in a
context where stdout is available AND where you, the user, can see
stdout. When running chef manually (either using chef-client or via
test kitchen’s ‘kitchen converge’ command), you are watching output go
by on the console. So you can do things like:
And in a client run, you will see that output - in the compile phase.
You can get nearly the same functionality - but with a timestamp and
some terminal coloring, if you use Chef::Log in the same context:
Gives:
NB the default log level for chef-client writing messages to the
terminal is warn or higher. So if you try to use
Chef::Log.debug('something') you won’t see your message unless you
have turned up the verbosity. This unexpected feature, caused me a bit
of grief initially as I couldn’t find my log messages anywhere. Now
what I do is use Chef::Log.warn while debugging locally and then plan
to take the messages out before I commit the code.
From my experiments, just about anywhere you might use puts, you can
use Chef::Log. I think the later is probably better because it will
probably put information into actual log files in contexts like test
kitchen that write log files for examining later.
If you need something logged at converge time instead of compile time,
you have 2 options, use the log resource, or wrap Chef::Log inside
a ruby_block call. In either case, during the compile phase, a new
resource gets created and added to the resouce collection. Then during
the converge phase, that resource gets executed. Creating a Chef::Log
statement inside a ruby_block probably isn’t too useful on its own,
though it may be useful if you have created a ruby_block for some
other reason. This gist has some example code and the output:
https://gist.github.com/cnk/e5fa8cafea8c2953cf91
Each chef run has 2 phases - the compile phase and the converge phase.
Compile phase
In the compile phase, the chef client loads libraries, cookbooks, and
recipess. Then it takes the run list, reads the listed recipes, and
buids a collection of the resources that need to be executed in this
run. Ruby code within the recipe may alter what resources are added to
the resource collection based on information about the node. For
example, if the node’s OS family is ‘debian’, package commands need to
use ‘apt’ to install packages. So if you are installing emacs, the
resource collection on an ubuntu box will have an ‘apt’ resource for
installing that package - but the resource collection on a RHEL box
will have a ‘yum’ resource instead.
The compile phase also has logic for creating a minimal, ordered
collection of resources to run. Part of this process is
deduplication. If multiple recipies include apt’s default recipe
(which calls ‘apt-get update’), the compile phase adds this to the
resource collection once. Any other calls to the same resource are
reported in the run output as duplicates.
Converge phase
The converge phase is the phase in which the resource code actually
gets run. As the each resource runs, information is added to the run
status object - some of which can later be written back to the chef
server as the node status at the end of the run.
Run status information
The Customizing Chef
book has some useful information about what chef collects in the run
status object. For example, the run status object has a reference to
the node object at the start of each run (basically node information
from the chef server combined with the data collected by ohai). It
also has a reference to the run context object:
This object contains a variety of useful data about the overall Chef
run, such as the cookbook files needed to perform the run, the list
of all resources to be applied during the run, and the list of all
notifications triggered by resources during the run.
Excerpt From: “Customizing Chef” chapter 5 by Jon Cowie
Two very useful methods are ‘all_resources’ and
‘updated_resources’. One of the examples on the book is a reporting
handler that logs both of those lists to a log file (see Handler
Example 2: Report Handler)